![]() ![]() An interrupt-handler may leave some post-processing works to the system tasks by setting some control variables to certain values. When an interrupt event occurs, the corresponding interrupt-handler executes in response. These interrupt-driven systems consist of interrupt handlers and system-scheduling tasks. This paper proposes an approach to model and verify a certain class of interrupt-driven aerospace control systems. The simulation results show that the proposed schemes take a large amount of performance gain in the benchmark application programs. Therefore, it takes both advantages of the hybrid scheme and the expanded subblock size. It supports multiple page subblocks in the hybrid scheme. Last, we propose VS-hybrid which replaces the partial-subblock TLB in the hybrid scheme with a partial VS-TLB. VS-TLBs have a much larger TLB reach than subblock TLBs with a cost of a small number of bits. Second, VS-TLBs are an extension of subblock TLBs to support multiple page subblocks, while subblock TLBs can support only single page subblocks. The hybrid scheme has as high a superpage utilization as the shadow memory, and avoids most of the problems in the shadow memory by the virtue of partial-subblock TLB. First, we propose a hybrid scheme which integrates both the shadow memory and a partial-subblock TLB, thereby enjoying the benefits inherited from both sides. We propose three novel approaches to improve superpage supports. ![]() The shadow memory looses most of the constraint but introduces other serious problems. A partial-subblock TLB looses only a small portion of the contraint and limits the superpage size at a cost. Two previous solutions, a partial-subblock TLB and the shadow memory were proposed to loose the contraint. ![]() It can be used by the programmer to initiate an interrupt procedure at any desired point in the program.While superpages are an efficient solution to increase TLB reach, strong contraint for using superpages hinders the actual utilization. #Program interrupt in computer architecture notes softwareA software interrupt is a special call instruction that behaves like an interrupt rather than a subroutine call. Software InterruptsĪ software interrupt is initiated by executing an instruction. External interrupts depend on external conditions that are independent of the program being executed at the time. If the program is rerun, the internal interrupts will appear in the same place each time. Internal interrupts are synchronous with the program while external interrupts are asynchronous. The main difference between internal and external interrupts is that the internal interrupt is initiated by some exceptional condition caused by the program itself rather than by an external event. The service program that processes the internal interrupt determines the corrective measure to be taken. These error conditions generally appear as a result of premature termination of the instruction execution. Internal interrupts are also called traps. Internal interrupts arise from illegal or erroneous use of an instruction or data. Power failure interrupt can have as its service routine a program that transfers the complete state of the CPU into a non-destructive memory in a few milliseconds before power ceases. ![]() The timeout interrupt can result from a program that is in an endless loop and thus exceeded its time allocation. There are three major types of program interrupts that are as follows − External InterruptsĮxternal interrupts come from input-output (l/0) devices, from a timing device, from a circuit monitoring the power supply, or from any other external source. Control returns to the initial program after the service program is implemented. Program interrupt defines the transfer of program control from a currently running program to another service program as a result of an external or internal created request. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |